Implementation & Installation
Implementation & Installation
Implementation &
Installation
One Operating Model.
Three engagement pathways for different execution contexts.
One Operating Model.
Three engagement pathways for different execution contexts.
Workshop
Each participant implements the Operating Model in their own work.
Each participant implements the Operating Model in their own work.
Team-Led Installation
The team implements the Operating Model in each member’s work and establishes its own Shared Execution Rules for work that crosses between team members.
The team implements the Operating Model in each member’s work and establishes its own Shared Execution Rules for work that crosses between team members.
Organizational Installation
The Operating Model is implemented throughout the organization, with organization-wide Shared Execution Rules governing work that crosses teams and organizational boundaries.
The Operating Model is implemented throughout the organization, with organization-wide Shared Execution Rules governing work that crosses teams and organizational boundaries.
Three Engagement Pathways
Each pathway applies whether work is executed by people, AI agents, or both.
Focus
The individual’s own work
Work between people inside the team
Work between teams and organizational units
The question it answers
How do I handle my own
workload under pressure?
How do I handle my own workload?
How does work hold as it moves through our team?
How does work hold through our team?
How does work hold across our organization?
What changes
Individuals handle their own work more reliably
The manager is no longer the only coordination layer
Teams coordinate more reliably across the organization
What is put in place
Structure inside one
person’s work
Shared Execution Rules within the team
Shared Execution Rules across teams and units
What breaks without it
Commitments drop inside one
person’s work
Commitments drop inside one person’s work
Commitments drop as work moves between people on the team
Commitments drop as work moves between teams
Who carries the structure
Who carries the
structure
Each person, for themselves
The team, by its
Shared Execution Rules
The organization, by its
Shared Execution Rules
The organization, by its Shared Execution Rules
How far it reaches
Across one person’s own work
Across a whole team
Across multiple teams and units
Focus
The individual’s own work
The question it answers
How do I handle my own
workload under pressure?
What changes
Individuals handle their own work more reliably
What is put in place
Structure inside one
person’s work
What breaks without it
Commitments drop inside one
person’s work
Who carries the structure
Each person, for themselves
How far it reaches
Across one person’s own work
Focus
Work between people inside the team
The question it answers
How does work hold as it moves through our team?
What changes
The manager is no longer the only coordination layer
What is put in place
Shared Execution Rules within the team
What breaks without it
Commitments drop as work moves between people on the team
Who carries the structure
The team, by its
Shared Execution Rules
How far it reaches
Across a whole team
Focus
Work between teams and organizational units
The question it answers
How does work hold across our organization?
What changes
Teams coordinate more reliably across the organization
What is put in place
Shared Execution Rules across teams and units
What breaks without it
Commitments drop as work moves between teams
Who carries the structure
The organization, by its
Shared Execution Rules
How far it reaches
Across multiple teams and units
One Operating Model across individual work, teams, and organizations.
Where to begin
How does each person govern the execution of their own work?
If that is the question, the Workshop is the right engagement. It implements the Operating Model at the individual level, and for that level it is complete.
How does work hold as it crosses between people inside a team?
If that is the question, Team-Led Installation is the right engagement. It includes individual implementation and establishes the team’s own Shared Execution Rules.
How does work hold across teams and units?
If that is the question, Organizational Installation is the right engagement. It includes individual implementation and establishes the organization’s own Shared Execution Rules across teams and organizational boundaries.
Where to begin
How does each person govern the execution of their own work?
If that is the question, the Workshop is the right engagement. It implements the Operating Model at the individual level, and for that level it is complete.
How does work hold as it crosses between people inside a team?
If that is the question, Team-Led Installation is the right engagement. It includes individual implementation and establishes the team’s own Shared Execution Rules.
How does work hold across teams and units?
If that is the question, Organizational Installation is the right engagement. It includes individual implementation and establishes the organization’s own Shared Execution Rules across teams and organizational boundaries.
OTC International
The Operating Model
for the Execution Layer
OTC International
The Operating Model
for the Execution Layer
OTC International
The Operating Model
for the Execution Layer